Forensic Social Work

Running Head : FORENSIC SOCIAL WORKXXXXXXXXXXXXXQuestion 1 - A tender worker may be called to avow in move , and must know the differences surrounded by being called to watch as fact or dexterous watch in for him /her to be an effective dish . Explain the differences and similarities , if any in the midst of the fact and apt witness . Include randomness on how the roles have diverse goals methods of presentation and rules of presenting proofAnswer 1 - Here , the carve up thing to notice about is tender worker is distinguishable from an advocate . Social workers can be called to philander for good word . They work for the court not for the one who retained him impose up relies on his testimony and secure witness of the honor . To rise as a fact , the testimony should contri thate neat and reliable indorses like any documentary demo , material evidence , digital evidence , demonstrative evidence , or scientific evidence . As an secure witness , the amicable worker can use his /her expertise to impart his views and flavours on the case . He can use logics and command smack . The main difference between the fact and expert witness is , a fact is always associate to the information that is related to the case , where is the expert witnessing is opinion of that particular expert with no relation to the facts and possibilities of situations related to the case . It is answer , but he should answer exactly what he is questioned about . The expert is forwards it simply to tell the truth and to give his opinion and what exercising weight the Board attaches to his evidence should be utterly no occupation of the expert ( Hodgson . 2004 ,.

6Question 2 - Jane doubting Thomas , MSW , GSW (MSW master in social work GSW generalist in social work , bordering level up from a MSW ) has been subpoenaed by the billet of Family military service to avow on behalf of a shaver that has been placed in states custody . What are some of the things she should do in for her testimony to be effectiveAnswer 2 - As a Social role player , the primary focus of Jane Thomas is to operate in the best interest of the child throughout the evaluation process and court executions too . She should be naive in the proceeding regardless by whom she was retained . She should not accept any of the involved participants as therapy client as it is to be undertaken with essential caution . Custody evaluation depends on the question or issue raised . The evaluation o f parents or shielders , and the child is mandatory . She has to take note of the interaction between parents /guardians and the child . To testify on behalf of a child , she should in addition need a interview from the child , and interview from parents /guardian . Finally she has to chisel in reports to the parties and also to the court , and she should testify under oath as facts and she can give her expert opinion at the court . She should also be aware...If you wishing to get a skillful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper