Essay --

For over twenty years, bomber control has been a study topic in the United states. Withcountless amounts of public shootings taken stern, our uncouth is starting to question our second amendment which states a well regulated militia, world necessary to the security of a free state, the s senstilyly of the people to move on and bear arms, sh every not be infringed. It was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1790. It stated basically that people have the right to nourishment and bear arms. These rights were thought of as natural rights or God effrontery rights. Writ cardinal as a reminder to the government that they should not generate to stop the people from having this right. Should a person have the right to consume a gun for protection? Should we completely take away this right to prevent mass murder shootings in public places? A hand out of citizens feel uncomfortable to the accompaniment of not having protection and having their privile ges taken away due to other people and cruel decisions. Although times have changed from when the amendment was passed on December 15th, 1791, U.S. Citizens still feel it is a needed thing to have ownership of guns and have them in their daily lives. state-supported shootings came about in the early 1700s when the first shooting took place at Pontiacs Rebellion school on July 26, 1764. Four Lenape American Indians entered the schoolhouse near what today is Greencastle, Pennsylvania, shot and shilled the schoolmaster, and killed nine or ten children. Shootings such as the ones taken place in Virginia Tech, Colombine High School, sandy Hook Elementary, the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado all have effected the country in a drastic sensory faculty and really impacted us Americans to take change and mak... ...ll waiting to be passed explaining that expanded background checks on gun owners or potential gun owners was to be done. Turns out the senate squashed that bill. Pre sident Obama has pushed for gun restrictions after the devastate shootings that have been happening and blames the senate for the failure to expand background checks.Without the full cooperations from both(prenominal) sides of this debate nothing will ever be solved. Banning weapons is not going to completely stop crime. This has just turned into a fight against the rights of the individual stated in the constitution. Stricter gun regulations is not the solution only when tougher punishments might be. Gun control is not the answer to this problem and that just needs to be accepted so that crime rate can finally be decreased and everyone can live happy with the fact that something is being done in this situation.