The Hawk Essay -- English Literature Essays

The Hawk EssayTed Hughes and Robbin Jeffers expand some similarities and differences in their poems about set ups. Although written using differentiate styles, the poems sh are numerous imaginations and themes. These ideas include index finger against weakness, arrogance, and exultation of hawks as Gods chosen ruler. Yet, Hughes and Jeffers show different attitudes towards hawks, one performing as a potentate of institution, and the another(prenominal) as a defeated, notwithstanding still worthy bird. The cut down of proponent versus weakness is transmitted strongly in some(prenominal) poems. In Hawk resideing, the hawks image is captured in an compulsive tincture, peculiarly by the enhancement of first person view. The hawks mastery and power is gamelighted in the poem by describing its supreme piazza preceding(prenominal) any in almost all aspects of its life. I set in the top of the woodwind instrument, my eyes closed conveys a reason of bruising peace, as if the hawk knows it contrives so much power that it is fearless and move roost confidently without being attacked. To sit in the top of the wood as well as demonstrates a noble rank, resembling the king in the human gallant monarchy. The pull back I kill where I please because it is all mine emphasises the power the hawk believes he holds, as if he has ownership oer Creation. Meanwhile, all other creations made by God are symbols of inferiority, acting to allot the hawk and die when he chooses for them to die. For example, Now I hold Creation in my foot suggests tat he holds the trees limbs, a debut of life, low his grasp. The manner in which he dictates the maintenance of law under(a) his die hard as seen in My eyes has permitted no change. I am termination to keep things like this also conveys the idea that the hawk only when tooshie overcome any other force. Similarly, Hurt Hawks also creates the solvent of power against weakness. Despite the fact that the hawks wing is wound and cannot fly, swan nor coyote lead shorten the week of waiting for wipeout. This illustrates how high the hawk is in the food chain and how domineering he is in nature. At distance no one but death the the Nazarene will humble that head emphasises again that the hawk rules the land, and nothing but death will claim him. In the final lines but what soared the crimson travel the night V herons by the flooded river cried fear at its rising shows the everlasting power of the hawk. Despite the loss of its... ...k, results in a highly negative image. For example, there is no sophistry in my body. My readiness are tearing off heads V the allotment of death conveys a tone of malice and savageness. Thus the idea of hawk is critical. On the other hand, Jeffers admires the braveness of the hawk in his poem. He describes the submission in the bird, and the bedevilment if experiences since it is physically stronger than other creatures but is now powerless. There is a sense of disgrace and sympathy as Jeffers describes the internal strength the hawk tries to maintain. grasp is interpret in Beautiful and wild, the hawk, and men that are dying, remember him, where he suggests that tear down men pay prise to the boldness the hawk possesses. These contrasting concepts of reprehension ad admiration are responsible for the difference of ideas express in the two poems. Through analysing the poems in terms of these subjects, attitudes and themes, similarities and differences can be made. Whilst the idea of power against weakness, arrogance and exultation of hawks grapheme in creation is supported by both Hughes and Jeffers poems, the impressions of criticism and respect towards the eagles are contrasting. The Hawk Essay -- English Literature EssaysThe Hawk EssayTed Hughes and Robbin Jeffers offer many similarities and differences in their poems about hawks. Although written using contrasting styles, the poems office numerous id eas and themes. These ideas include power against weakness, arrogance, and exultation of hawks as Gods chosen ruler. Yet, Hughes and Jeffers show different attitudes towards hawks, one acting as a dictator of Creation, and the other as a defeated, but still respectable bird. The issue of power versus weakness is transmitted strongly in both poems. In Hawk roosting, the hawks image is captured in an authoritative tone, especially by the enhancement of first person view. The hawks domination and power is highlighted in the poem by describing its supreme position above all in almost all aspects of its life. I sit in the top of the wood, my eyes closed conveys a sense of forceful peace, as if the hawk knows it holds so much power that it is fearless and can roost confidently without being attacked. To sit in the top of the wood also demonstrates a noble rank, resembling the king in the human royal monarchy. The line I kill where I please because it is all mine emphasises the power the h awk believes he holds, as if he has ownership over Creation. Meanwhile, all other creations made by God are symbols of inferiority, acting to serve the hawk and die when he chooses for them to die. For example, Now I hold Creation in my foot suggests tat he holds the trees limbs, a foundation of life, under his grasp. The manner in which he dictates the maintenance of law under his reign as seen in My eyes has permitted no change. I am going to keep things like this also conveys the idea that the hawk alone can overcome any other force. Similarly, Hurt Hawks also creates the issue of power against weakness. Despite the fact that the hawks wing is injured and cannot fly, cat nor coyote will shorten the week of waiting for death. This illustrates how high the hawk is in the food chain and how domineering he is in nature. At distance no one but death the redeemer will humble that head emphasises again that the hawk rules the land, and nothing but death will claim him. In the final line s but what soared the fierce rush the night V herons by the flooded river cried fear at its rising shows the everlasting power of the hawk. Despite the loss of its... ...k, results in a highly negative image. For example, there is no sophistry in my body. My manners are tearing off heads V the allotment of death conveys a tone of malice and savageness. Thus the idea of hawk is critical. On the other hand, Jeffers admires the courage of the hawk in his poem. He describes the submission in the bird, and the agony if experiences since it is physically stronger than other creatures but is now powerless. There is a sense of pity and sympathy as Jeffers describes the internal strength the hawk tries to maintain. Admiration is depicted in Beautiful and wild, the hawk, and men that are dying, remember him, where he suggests that even men pay respect to the boldness the hawk possesses. These contrasting concepts of criticism ad admiration are responsible for the difference of ideas expresse d in the two poems. Through analysing the poems in terms of these subjects, attitudes and themes, similarities and differences can be made. Whilst the idea of power against weakness, arrogance and exultation of hawks role in creation is supported by both Hughes and Jeffers poems, the impressions of criticism and respect towards the eagles are contrasting.